Another problem, the victim of sound film, the director

Must start from somewhere. Waiting for a better tomorrow, the passivity and eternal regret. I have long thought that the "goal" is nothing but the "path" or "way" is not. Rzvyash what we have experienced today. I am fond of literature and art, then this will be the main theme of this blog.
It seems that the "fish and cat" made "Shahram Mokri" A lot of our audience is delighted. At least I Tjlylhay many times I've seen far too many movies. Although fans were not satisfied out of the theater, and I do not know why the dissident group have not been allowed to place their footprints marked in cyberspace. (Or I have not seen) in any case, a film Tmjydgran ask you about it, you are probably the first explanation is that "the movie was not even a cut!"
The fact also. "Fish and cat" may his name in the Guinness Book of 130 minutes without stopping to record video (I think sooner or later we will also see action in this regard), but it is the artistic value of such a record can be I highly doubt that.
The film is beautifully shot. Because of the special structure of the film (and, of course, require uninterrupted shooting) that the viewer the opportunity to walk in the woods with a camera and go from one end to the other side. When the selected features are really splendid special effects, the change is in the air (like the scene where the sky changes color), the special effects of high quality can even say that audience to curvet and other items.
Games, to compare players (almost any actor in the film is not known) and experimental films were bad. Among the many film versions of the story is simple and harmless rotating twisted and there was the music was very good and we felt that the audience was heavily aprons involved, but all are served "form" aprons film had. All hands were a "tempting idea" to happen. I think more than the idea that the "movie" is like a dream and it was like playing with the camera!
In the film, the director tried to use a symbol as well. Symbols that appear to be consistent with the atmosphere of semi-realistic stories but in general it is unlikely that viewers will be able to claim or symbolic function of these elements has recognized that. In this case I think the "temptations" of the "reasons" have been overcome. Film without its iconic duck hunters could also have the same sense that now is not confusing and unnecessary in this game.
Another problem, the victim of sound film, the director's passion for filming without a cut. Clearly the reason behind the camera, the scene is constantly changing aprons and the factors involved in the planning stages for the next and then change the decor, the director had to bail her voice and dubbing theater use. Thus, the opportunity to take advantage of the atmosphere by volume nature forest that would give the film another soul, lost and instead aprons will focus dubbed relatively weak, which are sometimes viewer Mynshynd be wiped out. Here I am back again to my first question: aprons "the need to apply this form are detrimental to other parts of the film is the victim of what?" He asked
Continuous shooting aprons technique, technique is not unfamiliar. For example, the famous movie scenes La Vie en Rose remember the beloved "Piaf" is dead and he is looking at apartments. Or another magnificent scenes of the movie Atonement along the beach, and the army was shattered, portrays. In both cases, no cut and moving video camera creative perplexity, confusion and even psychological stress upon the character of the movie is that it conveys to the audience. This is the reason or need to make use of a technique. But this was the case when the film "Cat Fish" review, aprons we not only will not make any response, but maybe we can put a finger on ten different aprons things that if decision on the Director's Cut was no shooting, the film could be strengthened .
Finally, I understand that the Shahab Hosseini aprons also recently made a film in which the role of 38 different roles. I still have not seen the movie Mr. Hussein, but from here I ask myself, "but the record in the Guinness Book *, what else may be necessary aprons to require that an actor can only be used in 38 different roles?" Repeat aprons such experiences, I have It looks extremely doubtful that these films, only a "shortcut" to shirk difficulties aprons are making a film in full!
Blog Archive Decembe